High CourtsSingle Bench

Mahin vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 29 November 2023 · Citation: (2023) 11 KL CK 0126

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammed Nias C.P., J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 22(c), 25, 29
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 9797 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 513 words

Mohammed Nias C.P., J

1.

This is an application for regular bail filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

The petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No. 1002/2023 of Gandhinagar Police Station for having committed offences punishable under Sections 22(c), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that, on 05.07.2023 at about 10.45 p.m, while the Sub Inspector of Police, Gandhinagar Police Station, conducted a search in the house of the petitioner, 31 grams of MDMA was seized from the bedroom of the petitioner in contravention of the provisions of the Act. Thus, the petitioner has committed the aforesaid offences as alleged.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would say that the petitioner is totally innocent and falsely implicated with ulterior motives. At any rate, he points out that the accused is in custody from 05.07.2023 and continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.

5.

The learned public prosecutor opposed the petition. The learned Public Prosecutor makes available the Chemical Analysis Report dated 08.11.2022 for perusal .

6.

After considering the rival submissions and taking into account the fact that only an intermediate quantity of contraband is involved, as revealed from the Chemical Analysis report, the fact that the petitioner has been in custody from 05.07.2023 and also since there is no apprehension raised by the prosecution that if released on bail the petitioner is likely to abscond, I hold that bail can be granted to the petitioner more so when no other criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner.

Accordingly, this application is allowed, and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer every Saturday between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m. till the final report is laid;

(iii) The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt to tamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence the witnesses;

(iv) The petitioner shall not be involved in any other crime while on bail.

(v) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, within seven days from the date of his release before the Court concerned, and if the release of the passport is required at a later period, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application for the same before the court having jurisdiction. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to that effect before the court concerned on the date of execution of the bond or within three days thereafter.

(vi) The petitioner shall furnish his present address along with the mobile phone number to the court concerned as well as to the Investigating Officer.

(vii) If any of the conditions are violated, the court concerned will be empowered to take steps for cancellation of bail as per law.