High CourtsSingle Bench

Mahmood Ali vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0107

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section, 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1055 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 167 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

Heard Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant and Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in FIR No.45 of 2015, which has been registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 504 and 506

of IPC, at Police Station â€" Rajpur, District- Dehradun.

Considering the overall evidence, which is presently available before this Court and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 27.04.2018, prima facie,

the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

Let the applicant be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the equal amount to the

satisfaction of the Magistrate/court concerned.

It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of grant of bail. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any

other proceedings.