AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
1.The petitioners are aggrieved of order dated 20.06.2009 passed in Misc. Appeal No.96 of 1988 by which the order passed by the Estate Officer has
been set-aside and the petitioners have been directed to vacate the land in question within one month from the date of the order.
Plea taken by the petitioners is that by virtue of registered sale-deeds dated 16.02.1970 and 09.06.1970 they have acquired right, title and interest
over the land in question and by operation of section 4 of Coking Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1972 the land in question would not vest in the coal
company. The issue raised by the petitioners is a pure question of law which has already been decided by the Supreme Court in “Bharat Coking
Coal
Limited vs Madanlal Agrawal†reported in AIR 1997 SC 1599. The appellate authority in its order dated 20.06.2009 has noticed that in Appeal
No.69/1995(R) this Court has held that by operation of law, the lands mentioned in the schedule to the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalization) Act, 1972
have vested in the coal company with effect from 01.05.1972. On this basis, the appellate authority has held that the land in question is a public land
and the respondents were unauthorized occupants falling within section 2(g) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971.
In the above facts, finding no infirmity in the impugned order dated 20.06.2009, the writ petition is dismissed.  Â
