High Courts

Malwa and another vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 September 2004 · Citation: (2005) 3 Cri.CC 70 : (2005) 2 RCR(Criminal) 662

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish Kumar Mittal, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37576 of 2004

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 185 words

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1.

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case F.I.R. No. 473 dated 9.7.1997, registered at Police Station Sarai Khawaja, Distt, Faridabad, under Sections 7/10/55 of the Essential Commodities Act.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Both the petitioners were on regular bail. Subsequently, their bail bonds were cancelled only on the ground that they did not appear before the trial Court on 12.7.2004. Counsel for the petitioners contends that in fact he had noted the date as 14.7.2004 instead of 12.7.2004. He further contends that in similar circumstances, coaccused Shiv Dutt, who is the main accused and whose bail bonds were also cancelled by the trial Court, has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated July 29, 2004 (Annexure P1) passed in Crl. Misc. No. 34041M of 2004.

In view of the aforesaid facts, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioners.

Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.