High CourtsSingle Bench

Mamta Arun Banmali Bhola vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 8 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 GUJ CK 0032

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. R. Mengdey, J
RESULT
Partly Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 7899 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 221 words

M. R. Mengdey, J

1.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

2.

This application is by the Applicant-convict seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days, on the ground to take care of newborn child. The Applicant Accused, who has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Heard learned APP Ms. Jirga Zhaveri for the Respondent – State. Learned APP has opposed the grant of temporary bail application.

3.

Learned advocate Mr. Beladiya for the applicant has submitted that the present applicant had delivered the baby in jail.

4.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the jail remarks, this Court is of the opinion that the present application requires consideration and the same is therefore partly allowed. The applicant – convict - MAMTA ARUN BANMALI BHOLA is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a period of 4 weeks from the date of her actual release on the applicant’s furnishing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned authority, on usual terms and conditions.

5.

The applicant-convict shall surrender before the concerned jail authority on expiry of the temporary bail period. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Registry to communicate this order through Fax to the Jail Authority.