High CourtsSingle Bench

Man Singh and Another vs State

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 14 December 2004 · Citation: (2004) 12 RAJ CK 0011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harbans Lal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 307, 326
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No''s. 5434/04 and 5658/04
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 251 words

Harbans Lal, J.—Since these two bail applications pertain to and arise out of the same FIR No.92/04 PS Mundawar Distt. Dausa for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 326 and 307 IPC, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2.

It is contended on their behalf that all other accused persons in this case have been released on bail by the learned court below. They have also referred to the case of "Milkhi Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan, 1999 C.L.R.(Raj.) 718 to contend that the medical officer has not opined that the injuries ascribed to the present petitioners are sufficient in tJie ordinary course of nature to cause death and, therefore, the case would not travel beyond the scope of Section 326 IPC. Learned PP has opposed the bail applications.

3.

Having carefully considered the aforesaid submission made at the bar, the nature of accusation against them, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I now deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.;

4.

In the result, both the bail applications are allowed and it is directed that petitioners Man Singh s/o Lallu Ram and Mahesh s/o Shree Chand shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court undertaking to appear before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial.