High CourtsSingle Bench

Mangal Das Tandey vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 18 June 2018 · Citation: (2018) 06 CHH CK 0048

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 3933 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 199 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

The only issue raised by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is the non-granting of leave encashment of 240 days.

2.

According to the petitioner, he has been paid a leave encashement of only 104 days at his retirement whereas he is entitled for leave encashment of 240 days.

3.

Taking into consideration the limited issue raised by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition, this Court does not intend to keep the Writ Petition pending, rather ends of justice would meet if the petitioner is directed to make a detailed representation to the respondent No.2 along with all the rule position as it stands for claim of 240 days of leave encashment. The respondent No.2, in turn shall scrutinize the same and take a decision as to whether the petitioner is entitled for 240 days of leave encashment or not and if he is entitled, let appropriate steps be taken for clearing the balance of amount to the petitioner forthwith.

4.

Let this exercise be done by the respondent No.2 within a period of 3 months from the date the petitioner makes a representation.

5.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off.