High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Mangat Ram vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 P&H CK 0035

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=3863>Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973</a>, <a href=3863-439>Section 439</a> - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail · <a href=2358>Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985</a>, <a href=2358-21>Section
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
27937 of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 296 words
1.

The petitioner prays for grant of regular bail under Section 439

of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short '' Cr.P.C .'') in FIR No.36 dated

6.5.2015 for offence punishable under Sections 21 and 22 of the Narcotic

Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 registered at Police Station

Mukandpura, District SBS Nagar, Punjab.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was

apprehended on the basis of some suspicion and later on, the present FIR

was registered. It is further submitted that the petitioner has undergone 1

year, 9 months and 18 days of actual sentence during the pendency of the

trial and the case is still at the stage of examination of prosecution witnesses

as only three PWs have been examined so far. It is also submitted that there

is no other FIR pending against the petitioner under the NDPS Act and the

conclusion of trial would take long time.

3.

Counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Sukhpal Singh,

has not disputed the factual position. As per the custody certificate dated

8.8.2017 filed in the Court, the petitioner is not involved in any other FIR

and has undergone 1 year, 9 months and 18 days of actual sentence.

4.

Without commenting on the merits of the case and considering

the fact that the petitioner has undergone about 1 year and 9 months of

sentence; only 3 witnesses out of 11 have been examined so far, the trial of

the case will take long time to be concluded and in view of the fact that the

petitioner is not involved in any other FIR, the petitioner is ordered to be

released on bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction

of trial Court.

5.

The petition stands disposed of.