High CourtsSingle Bench

Mangilal vs State of Rajasthan and Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 October 2007 · Citation: (2008) 1 WLN 410

HON’BLE JUDGES
Govind Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 · Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 — Section 97
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 6221 of 2007
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 254 words

Govind Mathur, J.—This petition for writ is preferred to challenge the order dt. 27.12.2006 passed by Additional Collector (Administration), Chittorgarh rejecting the revision petition preferred by the petitioner u/s 97 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1994"). The revision petition aforesaid was preferred to challengea patta dt. 06.01.2006 granted by Gram Panchayat Shadi in favour of Government Primary School Chandrakheri, Tehsil Begu for construction of school building. Learned Additional Collector while rejecting the revision petition held that the land was allotted in public interest after adhering the procedure prescribed under the relevant rules.

2.

The contention of counsel for the petitioner is that the land allotted to the Government Upper Primary School also includes a portion of land i.e. in possession of the petitioner and, therefore, same could have not been allotted to anybody else.

3.

I have considered the contention raised by counsel for the petitioner and also examined the order impugned.

4.

Learned Collector while rejecting the revision petition preferred by the petitioner specifically stated that no interference shall be made with the land measuring 30 x 45 feet allotted to the petitioner under the patta dt. 05.03.2002, as such the apprehension of the petitioner that the land allotted to him shall also be occupied by the school is absolutely ill-founded. I do not find any error in the order impugned that may warrant interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

5.

Accordingly, this petition for writ is dismissed.