High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Mangla Ram S/o Shri Gokala Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 23 February 2017 · Citation: (2017) 02 RAJ CK 0075

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
CASE NUMBER
1735 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 249 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

2.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection

with F.I.R. No.2/2017, Police Station Sanchore, District Jalore for

the offences under Sections 143, 427, 452, 323 & 308 IPC.

3.

Co-accused Raghunath Ram and Sujana Ram have been

granted bail by this Court. Though the petitioner is allegedly

involved in 11 previous cases but all those cases were registered

in between the period between 1995 to 2002. In the present case,

there is no specific allegation against the petitioner regarding

causing any particular injury to the injured.

4.

Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and

circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of

the arguments advanced at the Bar and without expressing any

opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that

the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

5.

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered

that the accused-petitioner, Mangla Ram arrested in connection

with F.I.R. No.2/2017, Police Station Sanchore, District Jalore shall

be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of

Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear

before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called

upon to do so.