High CourtsSingle Bench

Mani Kumar Subba vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 17 June 2024 · Citation: (2024) 06 SIK CK 0029

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 52 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 97 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent nos.1 and 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since it was served upon him five day ago he was not able to draft the rejoinder. He seeks more time to file rejoinder. Two weeks time is granted to the petitioner to file rejoinder. The learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 to 6 submits that they do not desire to file counter affidavits and would rely upon the counter affidavit filed by respondent nos. 1 and 2.

2.

List on 11.07.2024.