AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 393 wordsHeard the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.
In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the
present.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019, corresponding to POCSO No.20 of 2019 registered
under sections 376DA of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4/6 of POCSO Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed rape upon the minor victim girl. It is
submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court to the statement of the victim recorded in connection with
Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.13 of 2019, relating to the same occurrence, it is submitted that that in the said statement recorded under Section 164
Cr.P.C. of the victim, she has categorically stated that the petitioner has established physical relationship with her consent. It is further submitted that
for the self- same occurrence, two cases being Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.13 of 2019 and Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019 have been registered.
It is also submitted that the medical examination report of the victim suggests that the victim has no recent sign of sexual intercourse nor any injury
was found on the private parts of the victim and the petitioner has not ravished the victim. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-
operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.01.2019 as mentioned in paragraph 7 of the bail
application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty
five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-IV- cum-Special Judge,
POCSO, Ranchi in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 04 of 2019, corresponding to POCSO No.20 of 2019 with the condition that he will co-
operate with the trial of the case.
