High CourtsSingle Bench

Manish @ Mannu vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 RAJ CK 0057

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kuldeep Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 323, 376(2)(n), 420, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3486 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 359 words

Kuldeep Mathur, J

This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.11/2023 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Sri Ganganagar, for offence under Sections 376(2)(n), 420, 323, 506 of IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor as also learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prosecutrix is a divorcee woman having two children from her previous marriage. Learned counsel submitted that from the perusal of the FIR, it is evident that the allegations upon the present petitioner is of indulging in consensual sexual relationship with the prosecutrix on the false pretext of marriage. Learned counsel submitted that in view of the fact that the prosecutrix of her free will and violation entered into consensual sexual relationship with the present petitioner, it cannot be presumed that she did not have sufficient maturity to understand the consequences of these relations. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case; the petitioner is in judicial custody; challan has already been filed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time to conclude, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application.

Heard.

Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the possibility that the trial may take long time to conclude, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Manish @ Mannu S/o Ajay Sharma shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR No.11/2023 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Sri Ganganagar, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.