High CourtsSingle Bench

Manishkumar Morarilal Sharma vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 2 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 GUJ CK 0008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep N. Bhatt, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 — Section 65(a), 65(e), 81, 98(2), 116B · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 114, 120B, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 20219 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 525 words

Sandeep N. Bhatt, J

1.

Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2.

Heard learned advocate, for the applicant and learned APP, Mr. Dhawan Jayswal.

3.

This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. registered at C.R. No.11993005210077 of 2021 with Adesar Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B, 81, 98(2) of the Prohibition Act and under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B and 114 of IPC.

4.

Heard and examined the papers placed for consideration in support of the submission made at bar.

5.

Upon hearing submission, following picture emerges on record :-

(i) Applicant was arrested on 26.09.2022.

(ii) Two antecedent are registered qua the applicant.

(iii) The offences alleged against the applicant

are triable by Magisterial Court and considering the pendency before the concerned Magisterial Court, there is no likelihood of commencement and conclusion of trial within near future and therefore, refusal of bail will amount to pre-trial conviction, which is prohibited by law.

(iv) The applicant has deep root in the society, no apprehension as to flee away or escape trial or tempering with the evidence /witnesses is expressed.

(v) In view of above position emerging at the end of hearing, the application deserves consideration, but by imposing suitable condition to be observed by the applicant, pending investigation and trial.

6.

Hence, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.11993005210077 of 2021 with Adesar Police Station, on executing a bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that the applicant shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] not leave the territory of India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

[d] appear before the Investigation Officer concerned, as and when required for investigation purpose and attend the Court concerned regularly.

[e] furnish the present address of residence along with the proof to the I.O. concerned and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Sessions Court concerned;

7.

The competent authority will release the applicant only if the applicant is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

8.

Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted