High CourtsSingle Bench

Manjeet And Another vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 16 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 P&H CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arun Palli, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 302, 307
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 17421 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 338 words

Arun Palli, J

Vide this petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., the petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in FIR No.97, dated 01.04.2021, under Section 307 IPC (Sections 302 & 120-B IPC added lateron), registered at Police Station Sector 13/17 Panipat, District Panipat.

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, this Court vide order dated 21.05.2021 had granted interim bail to the petitioners:

"Submits inter alia that a bare perusal of the FIR would go to show that assault on the victim leading to his death subsequently took place while the said victim was already in Police custody, along with Balwan Singh, who happens to be father of the present petitioners, and that the FIR lodged by the Police Officer concerned also imputed the assault only to the said Balwan Singh, and that the present petitioners, who are his sons have been motivatedly roped in later, at the instanace of the deceased's relatives.

Now, to come up on 15.09.2021.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest of the petitioners by the Arresting/Investigating Officer, they shall be released on interim bail subject to the following conditions:-

1.

That they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required;

2.

That they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer and;

3.

That they shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court."

Learned State counsel, upon instructions from SI Satish Kumar, submits that both the petitioners had since joined the investigation and as no recovery is to be effected from them, they are not required for any custodial interrogation/investigation.

In the wake of the above, the order dated 21.05.2021 is made absolute.

However, the petitioners shall abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.