High CourtsSingle Bench

Manjeet Rai vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 P&H CK 0037

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Shekhar Attri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No.722 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 530 words

This is a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the

respondents to release Amandeep Kaur wife of the petitioner from illegal custody of respondents No.4 and 5.

The facts of the case are that earlier the petitioner and Amandeep Kaur filed CRM-M-22932-2018 before this Court for grant of protection which

was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 25.5.2018 (Annexure P-1). Thereafter, Amandeep Kaur was sent to her mother and brother. In para 4

of the petition, it has been specifically stated by the petitioner as under : -

“4. That after passing of P-1 the petitioner and detenue Amandeep Kaur were at home of the petitioner. On 29.05.2018 mother and brother of

Amandeep Kaur came to the house of the petitioner to meet her daughter. They said that they will not cause any harm to the petitioner and

Amandeep Kaur and they want to solemnize their marriage in the presence of the relatives of both the parties. On this the petitioner's family did not

raise any objection and on their request Amandeep Kaur was sent with them. They assured the petitioner and Amandeep Kaur that within 15 days

their marriage will be solemnized with great pump and show. But during these 15 days they did not allow the petitioner to talk with Amandeep Kaur.

Even as per protection order passed by this Hon'ble Court the police has also recorded the statements of the parties during this period. After 15 days

the petitioner went to the house of respondents NO.4 and 5 but they said that wait for some time and they did not allow the petitioner to talk with his

wife Amandeep Kaur. Thereafter, many times the petitioner contacted respondents No.4 and 5 but they kept making excuses one or the other and did

not allow the petitioner to meet his wife. Ultimately in the 2nd week of August, 2018, all the family members of the petitioner met the Sarpanch of the

village of respondents No.4 and 5 and told him the entire story then the Sarpanch of their village met respondents No.4 and 5 and then they again

assured that very soon they will send Amandeep Kaur alongwith the petitioner. But now they have flatly refused to send Amandeep Kaur to the

house of the petitioner for the reason that their caste is different and they are not happy with their marriage and now they cannot perform their

marriage again due to their caste difference. Amandeep Kaur wants to come back with the petitioner but her mother and brother did not allow her and

she is under their pressure.â€​

A bare perusal of the above said paragraph shows that

Amandeep Kaur has gone with her mother with the consent of the petitioner and it cannot be said that she was kept illegally by her mother and

brother.

To the mind of this Court, the filing of this petition is an abuse and misuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed with

costs of ` 25,000/- to be paid to the wife of the petitioner namely Amandeep Kaur.