High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 UK CK 0016

Manju Agarwal vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3318 Of 2016

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 239 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 08.08.2016 passed by State Information Commission and the consequential

orders dated 20.08.2016 & 29.11.2016 passed by Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Kotdwar.

2.

Vide order dated 08.08.2016, State Information Commission had expressed displeasure regarding inaction on the part of Sub Divisional Magistrate,

Kotdwar and had directed the Public Information Officer/ Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Kotdwar to take necessary action with the help

of local administration to remove the encroachment alleged to have been made by the petitioner within 15 days. Pursuant to the said order, Executive

Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad has passed the order dated 29.11.2016, whereby petitioner was called upon to remove his alleged illegal construction

within a week failing which same shall be demolished by Nagar Palika Parishad.

3.

It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that direction issued by State Information Commission for removing the encroachment is

beyond scope of his powers under Right to Information Act.

4.

This Court finds substance in the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. Under the Right to Information Act, there is no such power available

to State Information Commission.

5.

In such view of the matter, writ petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 08.08.2016 passed by State Information Commission and the

consequential orders dated 20.08.2016 & 29.11.2016 passed by Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Kotdwar are quashed.