AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 274 wordsManoj Kumar Tiwari, J
Petitioner constructed a shop within municipal limits of Kotdwar after purchasing land from one Mr. Ajit Kumar Garg.
Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Kotdwar has passed an order on 02.03.2017, whereby petitioner, along with certain other persons, was
asked to remove her unauthorized construction over public land. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order has been passed in absolute disregard of Principles of Natural Justice as no
notice nor any opportunity of hearing was given to her.
Nagar Palika Parishad, Kotdwar had not filed any counter affidavit so far, therefore, the averment regarding violation of Principles of Natural
Justice, made in paragraph no. 1 of the writ petition, remains un-rebutted.
It is settled position in law that any order, which entails civil or evil consequences to a person, can be passed only after providing reasonable
opportunity of hearing.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner shall give reply to the impugned
order by treating it to be a notice, within 15 days from today. Petitioner shall enclose all documents to substantiate her claim regarding title over the
subject land, with her reply. The Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad shall consider petitioner’s representation and also the documents, if
any, filed by the petitioner and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law, within six weeks thereafter.
For a period of six weeks or till decision is taken on petitioner’s reply, whichever is earlier, status quo regarding shop in question shall be
maintained.
