High CourtsSingle Bench

Manju C.P vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 31 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 KL CK 0227

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 320, 482 · Indian Penal Code,1860 — Section 323, 498A, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 6414 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 371 words

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This Crl.M.C. has been preferred to quash Annexure I FIR in Crime No. 890/2021 of Ernakulam Town North Police Station on the ground of

settlement between the parties.

2.

The petitioner is the defacto complainant.  The 2nd respondent is the accused.

3.

The offence alleged against the 2nd respondent are under Sections 498A, 323 and 506 of IPC

5.

I have heard Smt. K.V. Bhadra Kumari, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. M.P. Prasanth, the learned Public Prosecutor.

6.

The averments in the petition would show that the entire dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and the de facto

complainant/petitioner has decided not to proceed with the crime further. The learned Prosecutor, on instruction, submits that the matter was enquired

into through the investigating officer and a statement of the de facto complainant was also recorded wherein she reported that the matter was

amicably settled.

7.

The Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [2012 (4) KLT 108 (SC)], Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

[(2014) 6 SCC 466] and in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others [(2019) 5 SCC 688] has held that the High Court invoking

S.482 of Cr.P.C can quash criminal proceedings in relation to non compoundable offence where the parties have settled the matter between

themselves notwithstanding the bar under S.320 of Cr.P.C. if it is warranted in the given facts and circumstances of the case or to ensure ends of

justice or to prevent abuse of process of any Court.

8.

The dispute in the above case is purely personal in nature. No public interest or harmony will be adversely affected by quashing the proceedings

pursuant to Annexure I. The offences in question do not fall within the category of offences prohibited for compounding in terms of the

pronouncement of the Apex Court in Gian Singh (supra), Narinder Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra).

For the reasons stated above, I am of the view that no purpose will be served in proceeding with the matter further. Accordingly, the Crl.M.C. is

allowed. Annexure I FIR in Crime No. 890/2021 of Ernakulam Town North Police Station stands hereby quashed.