AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 114 wordsS.K. Mishra, J
Mr. R.P. Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that, in the meantime, there is no dispute between the parties.
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma, the learned counsel for the respondent No.4, also submits that there is no further apprehension to anybody’s life.
Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State, also submits that the Circle Officer has enquired into the matter and after finding the guilt of the Station House Officer, Kotwali Gangnahar, Roorkee, District Haridwar, made adverse entry in his service book.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition has become infructuous.
It is, hereby, dismissed as infructuous.