AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
11 paragraphs · 206 wordsThis writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post the petitioner at a place where her husband, who is in
Government service is posted.
Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including the submissions that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and
wife at the same station and that at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions. In view of the submissions, which have
been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State
Government.
The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with the copy of the present writ petition. If such a fresh representation is made, the
same may be considered by the respondents objectively and decide the same by a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date a copy
of this order along with writ petition / representation is placed before the respondents.
The stay application also stands disposed of.
