High CourtsSingle Bench

Manoj vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 12 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 MP CK 0087

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rohit Arya, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 366, 376(2)(n) · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 5(L), 6
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.39827 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

36 paragraphs · 674 words

Rohit Arya, J

This is the first bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The applicant is in custody since 28.07.2021 in connection with Crime No.266/2021

registered at Police Station Barod, District Agar for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) of IPC and Section 5(L)/6 of Protection

of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

As per prosecution story, a missing person report was lodged by the father of the prosecutrix on 02.07.2021. She was recovered on 28.07.2021.

Accordingly, the case has been registered.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. He is no more required for custodial

interrogation, as challan has been filed and there is no criminal antecedents against the applicant. On merits it is submitted that infact the prosecutrix

and the applicant have married in Arya Samaj temple, as they were both in love with each other. She had gone with the applicant out of her free will.

Her date of birth in the mark sheet of Class IX is 13.01.2003.

Under such circumstances, the complicity of the applicant is on concocted facts. Even otherwise, he has already suffered jail incarceration since

28.07.2021. Looking to the COVID-19 situation, trial is not likely to conclude early in the near future. Hence, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

Per contra, learned Panel Lawyer supports the order impugned and opposes the bail application with submission that as per the class VI mark sheet,

she was minor and the case is of abduction and sexual exploitation.

Upon hearing counsel for the parties, in the obtaining facts and circumstances of the case, but without touching merits of the contentions so advanced,

regard being had to the fact that the applicant is in jail since 28.07.2021, he is not required for custodial interrogation, there is no criminal antecedents

and due to Covid-19 pandemic, the possibility of delay in conclusion of trial cannot be ruled out. Hence, applicant is held entitled for enlargement on

bail.

Consequently, the application of the applicant filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 is hereby allowed. It is directed that the

applicant be released on bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one solvent surety in the like

amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and on the condition that he shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and also

comply with the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with following further conditions:

(i) the applicant shall mark his attendance before the concerned Police Station on 2nd Saturday of every month between 10.00 AM to 12.00 Noon.

(ii) the applicant shall abide by the terms and conditions of various circulars and orders issued by the Government of India and the State Government

as well as the local administration from time-to-time in the matter of maintaining social distancing, physical distancing, hygiene, etc., to avoid

proliferation of Novel Corona virus (COVID-19);

(iii) the concerned jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, the medical examination of the applicant be conducted through the jail

doctor and if it is prima facie found that he is having any symptoms of COVID-19, then the consequential follow up action or any further test required

be undertaken immediately. If not, the applicant will be released on bail in terms of the conditions imposed in this order;

(iv) violation of conditions, State is free to apply for cancellation of bail.

(v) in future, if the applicant is found to be involved in such nature of cases or any other similar criminal cases or misuse the bail granted by this Court,

this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically.

Learned Panel Lawyer is directed to send an e-copy of this order to all the concerned including the concerned Station House Officer of the Police

Station for information and necessary action.

Registry is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Court concerned for necessary compliance.

E-certified copy as per rules.