High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 10 DEL CK 0105

Manoj vs State

Delhi High Court · Decided on 5 October 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1010 OF 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 269 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1.

Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.102/2018, under Section 380 IPC, registered at New Ashok Nagar. Â

2.

The allegations against the petitioner made by the prosecutrix in the FIR are that she suspects that the petitioner who is her husband had stolen

Rs.25,000/- and a gold chain and has handed over the same to the coaccused.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is no material to connect the petitioner with the

subject offence. He submits that the complaint is an offshoot of a matrimonial dispute.

4.

Petitioner was granted interim protection, subject to joining investigation by order dated 3rd May, 2018.

5.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State informs that petitioner did joined investigation, investigation has been concluded and charge-

sheet is being finalised for being filed in the Court.

6.

Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that petitioner has

been able to make out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.Â

7.

Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in

the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned. Petitioner

shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. Â

8.

The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

9.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.