High CourtsSingle Bench

Manoj Cheriyan @ Manoj K.C. vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 23 June 2022 · Citation: (2022) 06 KL CK 0259

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 4841 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 528 words

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This is an application filed u/s 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2.

The petitioner is the accused No.3 in Crime No.1158/2021 of Balussery Police Station. The offences alleged are under Sections 420 and 34 of the IPC.

3.

The prosecution case in short is that the petitioner along with the 1st and 2nd accused started a company, namely, P.T.Chacko Memorial Kisan Mitra Producer Company Ltd., and appointed the de facto complainant as staff in their office situated at Tattanpurayil and received an amount of Rs.10,000/- from her by allotting shares of the company worth Rs.1,000/- each and cheated her by not returning the salary and amount of shares received. It is further alleged that all the accused together collected an amount of Rs.1,000/- each from 140 farmers towards the share of the company and deposited the same in company's account and closed the office thereafter without giving back the amount of shares or its profits.

4.

Heard both sides and perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that there are no materials to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and hence he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. He contended that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the petitioner and if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would affect the course of investigation.

6.

Perusal of the case diary would reveal that prima facie there are materials on record to connect the petitioner with the crime. However, the petitioner was remanded to judicial custody on 08.06.2022. In view of the nature of the crime and the stage of investigation, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the petitioner is required for any purpose. The investigation seems to have reached a fair stage. The 1st and 2nd accused were granted anticipatory bail by this Court. For all these reasons, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail on conditions.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Saturday until further orders. The petitioner shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required by him.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of like nature while on bail.

(v) The petitioner shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The petitioner shall not leave State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.