High CourtsSingle Bench

Manoj Kumar & Ors vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0130

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 406, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.5117 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 340 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Crl.M.A.33721/2018 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 5117/2018

1.

Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 988/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Mangol Puri, based on a settlement. Â

2.

It is contended that petitioner no.1 is the husband of the respondent No.2. The subject FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord. Â

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2 have resolved their disputes and are amicably residing

together as husband and wife since 16.02.2017. Settlement agreement dated 30.07.2018 has also been executed between the parties.

4.

Parties are present in Court in person. They submit that they have reconciled their disputes and after they have started living together, a child has

also been born.Â

5.

Respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by counsel and identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has amicably

resolved the disputes with her husband and they are now cohabiting together. She submits that she does not wish to press charges against the

petitioners and has no objection to the quashing of the subject FIR.

6.

In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and

petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have started living together and further the respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the

complaint any further, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the

parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject

FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

7.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 988/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Mangol Puri and the consequent

proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

8.

Order Dastiunder the signatures of the Court Master. Â