High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 04 KAR CK 0062

MANOJ S/O SRINIVAS Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHO, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR PS

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 13 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rathnakala
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
1579 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

40 paragraphs · 404 words
1.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner/accused and the learned High Court Government

Pleader appearing for the respondent.

2.

The respondent-police have registered an FIR

No.688/2016 against three unknown persons. After

investigation, charge sheet is filed in respect of the offences

punishable under sections 302 and 323 r/w section 34 of

IPC against three accused persons. The petitioner is

arrayed as A-3.

3.

The allegation of the prosecution is, over a

trivial dispute between the accused and the deceased, on

5.12.2016 during night hours, A-1 picked up quarrel with

the deceased and CW-2. The deceased attempted to

escape from A-2 and A-3. They arrested his hands and A-1

stabbed him with button knife. They inflicted blows on CW-

2 who attempted to rescue the deceased. CW-2 admitted

the deceased to the hospital. The complaint is lodged by

the father of the deceased. No one is named in the

complaint. During the inquest mahazar also, there was no

reference to any assailants. The statement of CW-2/injured

eye witness is recorded. The petitioner was arrested on

22.12.2016. The statement of the injured witness/CW-2

was recorded on 25.12.2016. As per the statement, he was

very much with the deceased during the incident. He took

the injured to Koshys hospital in an auto and the Doctor

was there advised to go to some other hospital. At the

same time, parents of the deceased joined him etc., But

the statement of the complainant does not corroborate to

these facts. CWs-3, 6 and 7 are also said to be eye

witnesses. Their statements are recorded on 26.12.2016

and 20.1.2017. The veracity of the statements of these

witnesses is yet to be tested during their cross examination,

for the present, there is no impediment to allow the

petition.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is

enlarged on bail in Crime No.688/2016 of respondent-

police, subject to the following conditions:

(i) He shall execute a self bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two local sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court. The sureties shall produce their original title deeds pertaining to the immovable properties and their identity/Aadhar card for perusal of the Court. They must not have previous history of offering surety to any accused in any other criminal case so far.

(ii) He shall attend the Court on all hearing dates regularly and punctually.

(iii) He shall not threaten or terrorize the prosecution witnesses.