High CourtsSingle Bench

Manoj Swaroop vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 27 July 2011 · Citation: (2011) 07 UK CK 0076

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 302, 34
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 570 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 163 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Applicant-Manoj, who is in jail in connection with crime No. 65 of 2011, relating to offences punishable u/s 302, 120B read with Section 34 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is named in the FIR only on the basis of suspicion. It is also submitted that during investigation it is said that applicant was armed with DANDA, but there is no injury of DANDA on the person of the deceased as is evident from the post-mortem report.

4.

In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail.

5.

Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Manoj, be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee.