High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 08 JH CK 0019

Mantosh Kumar Mandal vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 16 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shree Chandrashekhar
CASE NUMBER
4393 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

29 paragraphs · 270 words
1.

Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and

perused the documents on record.

2.

Case-diary has been received and a copy of the

counter-affidavit is tendered in the Court.

3.

Be tagged at its proper place.

4.

On an allegation that the petitioner was illegally

carrying a precious stone valuing about Rs.1 Lac, he has been made

an accused in M.G.M. P.S. Case No.28 of 2017, which was registered

for the offence under Sections 413/414 IPC, u/s 4/21 of Mines and

Mineral (Development & Regulation) Act and u/s 33 of the Forest

Act.

5.

The petitioner claims that he is aged about 50 years with

three children. His elder son is a student of Bachelor of Arts and his

other son is a student of Indira ITI College, Jamshedpur.

6.

Mr. Nehru Mahto, the learned APP has opposed the

prayer for grant of bail and submits that seizure list witnesses have

supported the prosecution case.

7.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,

the petitioner, Binod Kumar Chaturbedi, is directed to be released

on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection

with M.G.M. P.S. Case No.28/2017, corresponding to G.R.

No.979/2017, on the following conditions:

(i) He shall appear before the trial court, regularly, and

(ii) He shall not change his place of residence without prior

permission of the court.

8.

The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of the

order be transmitted to the trial Court through ''FAX''.application is accordingly, disposed