High CourtsDivision Bench

Mantun Kumar vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 16 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 PAT CK 0215

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7634 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

34 paragraphs · 634 words

Heard the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for following relief:-

“That the present writ application is being filed for direction to the respondents authority to release the Blue & Black colour Hero Glamour

motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR09AB6592, Engine No. JA06ERJGL14376, Chasis No. MBLJAR025JGL10533 in favour of the petitioner

which has been seized by the respondent in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 51 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under

section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2016 which is pending to the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II-cum-

Special Judge (Excise Act), Begusarai.â€​

Informant is a police officer who has alleged in his complaint that while on patrolling duty he received information that Umesh Paswan is indulged in

sell of illicit mahua wine and as he reached said place he saw four miscreants standing by the side of road with one gallon and as they saw the police

they tried to flee away however two of them were nabbed after chase who disclosed their name and they were arrested and mahua wine kept in

gallon and motorcycle parked there were seized.

As the seized motorcycle was being used for transportation of illicit liquor as such motorcycle is liable for confiscation and bar of jurisdiction in

confiscation under section 60 is applicable in such cases and vehicle seized or detained under this act courts have no jurisdiction to make any order

with regard to such property. As such, the Special Court has rightly rejected the petition of petitioner for release of his motorcycle as contained in

“Annexure -3 of petition.

From the order passed by the Special Court Excise as contained in Annexure-3, it is also apparent that the concerned police station has sent its report

dated 22.10.2019 to the Special Court in which it has been stated that the owner of the vehicle is Mantun Kumar (petitioner) and recommendation for

confiscation of said vehicle has been made to District Magistrate, Begusarai.

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the District Collector/Confiscating Officer, Begusarai, on 28.09.2020

and District Collector, Begusarai, shall initiate confiscation proceeding if not yet initiated and serve a notice of confiscation proceeding if not yet

served upon the petitioner and thereafter petitioner shall file his show-cause within 15 days thereafter and the District Collector/Confiscating Officer

shall conclude the proceeding within 90 days from the date of filing his show-cause, failing which District Magistrate, Begusarai shall provisionally

release the vehicle of petitioner after due identification of ownership of the vehicle and on production of ownership and registration with respect to

vehicle in question in his name with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document.

The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

(i) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation

proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

(ii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

(iii) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the

petitioner and same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an

undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would

however be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

With said observations, this writ petition is disposed of.