AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 294 wordsSavitri Ratho, J
This is the second application of the petitioner under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in this Court for grant of bail to the petitioner in connection with Tarasingi P.S. Case No. 223 of 2023 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 238 of 2023 in the Court of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhanjanagar, Ganjam where chargesheet dated 03.11.2023 has been submitted for commission of offences punishable under Sections 457, 395 of IPC read with Section 25(6) of Arms Act against the petitioner and co-accused Akura Pradhan, Kuni Raya and A. Ajit Kumar Achary keeping investigation open for arrest of other accused persons.
This case has been listed before me as BLAPL No. 12267 of 2023 filed by co-accused A. Ajit Kumar Achary had been disposed of by me on 06.12.2023. Thereafter the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected on 02.02.2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhanjanagar in S.T. Case No. 238 of 2023.
BLAPL No. 14697 of 2023 filed by the petitioner earlier had been dismissed on 08.01.2024 granting him liberty to move for bail afresh after investigation is completed.
Mr. K.P. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meanwhile the case has been transferred to the court of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Bhanjanagar for trial and so the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the bail application with liberty to move the learned trial court for bail after examination of the material witnesses.
Considering the said prayer, the BLAPL is dismissed as withdrawn granting the aforesaid liberty.
BLAPL No. 2666 of 2024 filed by co-accused Akura Pradhan is also dismissed with similar observation.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
……………………………..