High CourtsSingle Bench

Maqsood Shah vs State

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 20 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 RAJ CK 0170

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 3, 25
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 837 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 224 words

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R.

No.248/2020, P.S. Beechwal, District Bikaner, for the offences under Sections 3/25 Arms Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

After the rejection of the first bail application on 2.12.2020, the charge-sheet has been filed. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time,

therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments

advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

Consequently, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Maqsood Shah S/o Kalu

Shah, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.248/2020, P.S. Beechwal, District Bikaner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond

of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees : Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.