High CourtsDivision Bench(1897) 11 MAD CK 0023

Marimuthu vs Saminatha Pillai

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 November 1897 · Citation: (1898) ILR (Mad) 366

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subramania Ayyar, J · Shephard, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 131 words
1.

All we have to say is whether, on the face of the plaint, a good cause of action is disclosed. The allegation of partnership dealings and of the

settlement of accounts between the partners followed by a promise on the part of one partner to pay a liquidated sum to the other amounts to a

contract supported by good consideration, and the law does not require it to be in writing. The case of Amuthu v. Muthayya ILR 16 Mad. 339

does not appear to be a case of mutual dealings. The case in Hirada Karibasappah v. Gadigi Muddappa 6 M.H.C.R. 197 is more in point.

2.

We must reverse the decree and remand the suit for disposal on the merits. Costs will be provided for in the revised decree.