High CourtsSingle Bench

Masoom Ali vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 21 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 UK CK 0891

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 452, 504, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 119 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 245 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime/FIR No. 457 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, on 18.05.2024, at about 7:30 P.M. the applicant alongwith co-accused entered into the house of the informant and attacked many persons, in which Gulsher, Shahnawaj and Julfikar sustained injuries.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the co-accused have already been granted bail. The injured Gulsher has named the co-accused Shahnawaj @ Gazi as a person, who has hit on his head with a sharp edged weapon. There is no incised wound also. It is argued that injured Gulsher has also stated that the applicant also hit on his with iron rod, but it is argued that there is only one injury on his head, which may be caused by a sharp edged weapon.

5.

These facts are not disputed by learned State counsel.

6.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.