High CourtsSingle Bench

Mazhar Amed vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 18 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0073

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kuldeep Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 115, 120B, 307, 411, 465, 467, 471 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 3, 5, 25, 25(6)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2193 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 129 words

Kuldeep Mathur, J

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present anticipatory bail application and seeks liberty that the petitioner may be permitted to surrender before the trial court and file an application for bail.

Accordingly, the instant application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court on or before 28.08.2023 and file an application for bail. It is expected from the trial Court that the bail application will be decided expeditiously.

Till 28.08.2023, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No.418/2022, registered at Police Station Banswara Kotwali, District Banswara, for the offences under Sections 307, 115(ii), 411, 465, 467, 471 and 120-B of IPC and under Sections 3/25(6) and 5/25 of Arms Act.