Supreme CourtFull Bench

M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 18 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 13 Scale 80

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sharad Arvind Bobde, CJ · A.S. Bopanna, J · V. Ramasubramanian, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 13029 Of 1985
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 307 words

IA NOS. 85655 AND 85658/2020 (APPLNS. FOR INTERVENTION AND DIRECTION ON B/O DELHI WASTE MGT. NAJAFGARH PVT.

LTD. AND I.A. NOS. 86182 AND 86184/2020 (APPLNS. FOR INTERVENTION AND DIRECTIONS ON B/O METRO WASTE HANDLING

PVT. LTD.)

Applications for impleadment are allowed for the purpose of instant applications for directions.

These are applications for registration of three types of vehicles viz., (a) CNG vehicles (2) BS-IV compliant vehicles and (3) BS-VI compliant

vehicles for being used for essential public utility services.

Insofar as CNG vehicles are concerned, there cannot be any valid rejection to the vehicles, as the emission from these vehicles is within the limits.

Therefore, we direct that these vehicles may be registered.

Insofar as BS-IV and BS-VI compliant vehicles are concerned, admittedly BS-VI norms came into force on 01.04.2020. The vehicles purchased upto

31.03.2020 were BS-IV compliant.

Admittedly the emission from BS-VI compliant vehicles is within the norms and hence the vehicles purchased on or after 01.04.2020 and which are

BS-VI compliant, should also liable to be registered.

Insofar as vehicles purchased upto 31.03.2020 which are BS-IV compliant are concerned, they must have been registered with the EVahan Portal

before the cut-off date to establish the date of purchase. If the purchase had been made on or before 31.03.2020 and these vehicles are BS-IV

compliant, such vehicles necessary for the Municipal Corporation to carry essential public utility services should also be registered. But such cases

shall be scrutinized by the Environment Pollution Control Authority (EPCA).

In order to avoid repeated applications being filed before this Court just for the purpose of getting registration, we direct that the EPCA shall scrutiny

the pending cases and submit a report to this Court so that a common order could be passed without the necessity for several interlocutory

applications.

The interlocutory applications stand disposed of in the above terms.