High CourtsSingle Bench

Md. Abdul Khalique vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 16 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 JH CK 0135

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 · Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 — Section 5, 7 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No.787 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 423 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahibganj (T) P.S. Case No. 100 of 2020 instituted under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5/7 of Lottery Vinimay Adhiniyam, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in running business of forged lottery tickets and transaction of Rs.20,000/- through Google Pay in the name of the petitioner was found from the mobile phone of the co-accused. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-11 of the instant anticipatory bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned A.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj (T) P.S. Case No. 100 of 2020 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.