High CourtsSingle Bench

M.D Aslam @ Muna vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 6 April 2023 · Citation: (2023) 04 OHC CK 0061

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Narasingh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164, 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 201, 379
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1990 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 324 words

V. Narasingh, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

The Petitioner is an accused in G.R. Case No.80 of 2023, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Keonjhar, arising out of Keonjhar Sadar P.S. Case No.32 of 2023, for commission of offence under Sections 379/201/34 of IPC.

3.

Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.439 Cr.P.C. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Vig), Keonjhar by order dated 09.02.2023 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel that the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2023 on the accusation of committing theft of a truck.

5.

Relying on the order dated 17.03.2023 relating to the co-accused M.D Sahazada Alam passed by this Court in BLAPL No.2227 of 2023, the petitioner seeks release inter alia on the ground of parity.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the accusation is on account of the co-accused statement. Hence, further continuance in custody is unwarranted.

7.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail in view of the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, as noted in the rejection order.

8.

Considering the manner of accusation in the case at hand, this Court directs the petitioner to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin over the matter.

9.

Additionally, it is directed that one of sureties shall be immediate member of the family of the petitioner.

10.

It is further directed that the petitioner appear before the I.O. once every week on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin till submission of final form. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the learned Court in seisin.

11.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

12.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per the rules.

…………………………………