High CourtsSingle Bench

Md Ishaque And Ors vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 8 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 PAT CK 0078

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madhuresh Prasad, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(v)(1)(s), 14A(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, 326
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal (Sj) No. 469 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 477 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Special PP for the State.

2 The appellants have preferred the present Appeal under Section 14A (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,

1989 (for brevity, SC/ST Act) against the refusal of their prayer for regular bail vide order dated 12.08.2020 passed by Additional Sessions Judge I -

cum- Special Judge, Kishanganj in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, 326 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 (2) (v) (1)

(s) of SC/ST Act in connection with Thakurganj Police Station (for brevity, PS) Case No 48 of 2020.

3 A quarrel between the female members of two families appears to be the background in which the alleged occurrence took place. It is alleged that

the co-accused Lal Bahadur, appellants and other persons named in the First Information Report (for brevity, FIR) had become violent and they were

using abusive language against the informant’s husband and other family members. There is specific allegation against co-accused Lal Bahadur of

having assaulted the informant’s husband with a dagger in his abdomen leading to grievous injuries to which he subsequently succumbed.

Appellant No 2 is in custody since 04.05.2020 and Appellants No 1 and 3 are in custody since 26.04.2020. As per statement made in paragraph 3 of

the Memo of Appeal, Appellants have no criminal antecedents.

4 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that there is no specific overt act alleged against the appellants.

5 In my opinion, in view of nature of accusation in the FIR, a case for grant of regular bail is made out. The impugned order dated 12.08.2020 requires

interference by this Court, which is, accordingly, set aside.

6 Learned Special PP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

7 Considering the rival submissions, this appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 12.08.2020 passed by Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special

Judge, Kishanganj in connection with Thakurganj PS Case No 48 of 2020 is set aside.

8 Let the appellants above named be released on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special Judge, Kishanganj in Thakurganj Police Station Case No 48 of

2020 subject to the following conditions:

(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the appellants who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

appellants. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the appellants.

(2) That the appellants will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.