High CourtsSingle Bench

Md. Kamran Khan And Ors vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 5 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 JH CK 0019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 175, 379 · Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concession (JMMC) Rules, 2004 — Rule 4, 54 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
CASE NUMBER
A.B.A. No. 4623 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 394 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No.47 of 2020 registered under sections 175, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4/54 of J.M.M.C. Rules, 2004.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that petitioners are the owner and driver of the Truck bearing registration no. UP- 17T-2113 which was seized by police for illegally transporting stones. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 10 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case.

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Rajmahal in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No.47 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.