AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
26 paragraphs · 500 wordsHeard Mr. Md. Naushaduzzoha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Raniganj PS Case No. 265 of 2020 dated 29.05.2020, instituted under Sections
341/323/324/325/307/379/427/447/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioners along with two others is that they came on the land of the informant and started cutting bamboo and when
protested accused no. 1 broke the leg of the informant by hitting from the back of an axe whereas another co-accused had given dabia blow and
further that petitioners no. 1 and 4 tore the clothes of the informant’s wife and snatched silver chain worth Rs. 5,000/- and others had also
assaulted.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the informant is the full brother of petitioner no. 1 and there is land dispute. It was submitted that
there is also a counter case in which also the present accused side sustained injury. It was submitted that the petitioners have no other criminal
antecedent. It was submitted that the allegation of tearing clothes and snatching silver chain is cosmetic and addition to implicate all the family
members.
Learned APP submitted that against petitioner no. 1 there is specific allegation of hitting from the back of an axe causing fracture on the leg of the
informant’s wife which has also been noticed by the Court below.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender
before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners no. 2, 3 and 4 namely, Bibi Keswari, Bibi Tamanna and Md. Shamsad Alam @
Md. Shamsad respectively, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, VI, Araria in Raniganj PS Case No. 265 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section
438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners no. 2, 3 and 4 namely,
Bibi Keswari, Bibi Tamanna and Md. Shamsad Alam @ Md. Shamsad respectively, (ii) that the petitioners no. 2, 3 and 4 namely, Bibi Keswari, Bibi
Tamanna and Md. Shamsad Alam @ Md. Shamsad respectively and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to their good behaviour, and (iii) that
the petitioners no. 2, 3 and 4 namely, Bibi Keswari, Bibi Tamanna and Md. Shamsad Alam @ Md. Shamsad respectively shall cooperate with the
Court and the police/prosecution. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or non-cooperation would lead to cancellation of their bail
bonds.
Prayer for pre-arrest bail of petitioner no. 1 namely, Md. Sabir Alam is rejected.
The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
