High CourtsSingle Bench

Md. Sahabuddin vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 1 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 JH CK 0014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 414 · Coal mines (Nationalization) Act, 1930 — Section 30 · Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Section 33 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
A.B. A. No. 4487 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 416 words

Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Mr. Lalit Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner... personally undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. case no. 86 of 2017 registered under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, section 30 of Coal mines (Nationalization) Act 1930, section 33 of Indian Forest Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that his motorcycle was involved in illegal transportation of coal. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has already sold the said motorcycle to one Pradeep Kumar Singh but the ownership has not been transferred. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 10 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 2,000/- and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1st class, Hazaribagh in connection with Bishnugarh P.s. case no. 86 of 2017 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.