AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
22 paragraphs · 449 wordsHeard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel along with Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, learned counsel, for the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Kumar,
learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
The petitioner is in custody in connection with Baruraj PS Case No. 49 of 2020 dated 05.04.2020, instituted under Sections 399/402/414 of the
Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B) (a)/26/35 of the Arms Act.
The allegation against the petitioner is that on secret information that criminals were planning to commit crime, when the police reached and
arrested the accused persons, from the petitioner, motorcycle, one firearm, two cartridges and one mobile phone were recovered.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has not been caught committing any offence and the allegation is that the police caught him
before he could commit any offence. It was submitted that after the police had arrested the petitioner in the present case, he has been implicated in
four other cases, but there has been no recovery in any of those cases, except for the present one. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in
custody since 07.04.2020.
Learned APP submitted that the petitioner has criminal antecedent and there is recovery of firearm and cartridges from his possession.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail
upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur (East) in Baruraj PS Case No. 49 of 2020, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close
relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the
petitioner shall also give an undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory
provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to
cancellation of his bail bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate
or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.
However, this order is subject to the main application supported by affidavit being e filed in this Court by learned counsel for the petitioner latest by
day after tomorrow.
The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
