High Courts

Meena vs State of U.P.and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 19 May 1998 · Citation: (1998) 05 AHC CK 0089

HON’BLE JUDGES
Virendra Saran, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 164 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 363, 366
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 289 of 1998
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 594 words

Virendra Saran, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Government Advocate.

2.

Smt. Meena is alleged to be a victim in an offence under Section 363/366, IPC registered as Crime No. 35/98 at P.S. Phardhan, Distt. Kheri. The FIR of the case was lodged by Krishna Kumar in which it was mentioned that his daughter had eloped with Randhir.

3.

Smt. Meena has filed this application with the allegations that she is major and has entered into marriage with Randhir on 1121998. A Medical Certificate of Chief Medical Officer, Kheri has been filed as Annexure 2 which shows that according to doctor age of Smt. Meena was about 18 years. In Annexure 4 Smt. Meena has filed two coloured photographs alongwith Randhir showing some marriage ceremony going on. Smt. Meena and Randhir are present in Court. No doubt photographs are of the persons who are present in Court. From appearance Smt. Meena appears to be a major. A copy of the marriage certificate of Arya Samaj Mandir, Barabanki has also been filed. Annexure 5 is Medical Certificate of Dr. Ranjana Mishra, Obstetrician and Gynaecologist which shows that urine test for pregnancy has been found to be positive. This certificate is dated 3041998.

4.

A prayer has been made in this application that the statement of Smt. Meena be recorded under Section 164, Cr. P.C. and the learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that in case Smt. Meena falls in the hands of police she may be coerced to make statement in line with the prosecution case. He has further submitted that forcible abortion may also be done in case Smt. Meena falls in the hands of police. Learned Counsel has also submitted that father of Randhir has been arrested on the basis of the FIR of Krishna Kumar at Lakhimpur Kheri and is in jail.

5.

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the averments made in the affidavit do not appear to be without force and I am of the view that in the interest of justice the statement of Smt. Meena be recorded u/S. 164, Cr. P.C.

6.

In the result, this application is allowed. Learned C.J.M. Lucknow, shall, on the production of a copy of this order before him, record the statement of applicant Smt. Meena u/S. 164, Cr.P.C. Applicant shall file an application for recording statement alongwith copy of this order in the first part of the working day. Applicant shall also file three sets of the coloured photographs (which have been filed in Annexure 4 in this application) before the C.J.M. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow, shall affix one set of photographs on the statement of Smt. Meena and shall keep another set in sealed cover. He shall send a copy of the statement so recorded to Investigating Officer of Crime No. 35/98 registered at P.S. Phardhan, Distt. Kheri. He shall forward original statement so recorded to learned C.J.M. Kheri, who in turn shall forward the same to concerned Magistrate, Incharge of cases of P.S. Phardhan. Third copy of the statement so recorded affixed with one set of photograph having seal of the Court shall be supplied to Smt. Meena.

7.

Before parting with, I would like to observe that on questioning Smt. Meena, it appears that she is not under any duress and she can give statement of her own free will.

8.

With the above directions, this application is disposed of finally.

Copy of the order may be given to learned Counsel on payment of necessary charges by tomorrow. Application disposed.