Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2021) 02 ATPMLA CK 0024

Mehta Real Home Developers Pvt. Ltd vs Deputy Director, Directorate Of Enforcement, Jaipur

Appellate Tribunal Under Prevention Of Money Laundering Act · Decided on 10 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. C. Mishra, Acting Chairman
CASE NUMBER
MP-PMLA-8192, 8193, 8194, 8195, 8196, 8197, 8198, 8199/JP/2021, FPA-PMLA-3898, 3899, 3900, 3901/JP/2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

45 paragraphs · 374 words

S.No.,Registry No./Date,Address of Property,"Area of

Property",Name of the owner

1.,"Registration No. 8136, Book

No. 1, Vol. No. 13978, Page

No. 54 to 60 dated 02.09.2015","Flat No. 605, 6th Floor, Manjusha Building,

57 Nehru Place, New Delhi (Commercial)",883 Sq. Ft.,"M/s. Mehta Real Home

Developers Pvt. Ltd.

2.,"Book No. 1, Jild No. 872, Page

No. 5, S. No. 2015397009784

and Sale Deed No.

2015397016185 dated

06.08.2015 SR Jaipur-V","Flat No. B-305, 3rd Floor, Shiv Gyan Luxora

Building on Plot No. G-2, Rajmahal Scheme,

Jamna Lal Bajaj Marg, Jaipur alongwith

Servant Room No. 8","1330 Sq. Ft.

Super Built Up","Mr. Ketan Mehta S/o

Mr. Kamal Mehta

3.,Sale deed not executed,"SFJ/2BR/GF/66 (SFJ/105) Shubhangan,

Omaxe City, Extn., Jaipur",83.61 sq. mtr.,"Mr. Kamal Mehta and

Ketan Mehta

4.,Sale deed not executed,"SFJ/2BR/GF/75 (SFJ/106) Shubhangan,

Omaxe City, Extn., Jaipur",83.61 sq. mtr.,"Mr. Kamal Mehta and

Ketan Mehta

5.,Sale deed not executed,"SFJ/2BR/SF/66 (SFJ/107) Shubhangan,

Omaxe City, Extn., Jaipur",85.19 sq. mtr.,"Mr. Kamal Mehta and

Ketan Mehta

6.,Sale deed not executed,"SFJ/2BR/SF/75 (SFJ/108) Shubhangan,

Omaxe City, Extn., Jaipur",85.19 sq. mtr.,"Mr. Kamal Mehta and

Ketan Mehta

7.,Sale deed not executed,"SFJ/2BR/FF/66 (SFJ/109) Shubhangan,

Omaxe City, Extn., Jaipur",85.19 sq. mtr.,"Mr. Kamal Mehta and

Ketan Mehta

8.,Sale deed not executed,"SFJ/2BR/FF/75 (SFJ/110) Shubhangan,

Omaxe City, Extn., Jaipur",85.19 sq. mtr.,"Mr. Kamal Mehta and

Ketan Mehta

Subject to the above, the parties are directed to maintain status quo with respect to all the properties, involved in the present appeals, till the next date",,,,

of hearing. The order of status quo is subject to further conditions:-,,,,

(i) Attachments shall continue.,,,,

(ii) The legal and constructive possession of the properties in question shall remain with the Enforcement Directorate;,,,,

(iii) The appellants are prohibited to create any third party right or dispose of the properties in question in any manner;,,,,

(iv) No encumbrance shall be created by the appellants in respect of the said properties.,,,,

(v) The appellants are directed not to change the nature and character of the properties.,,,,

The learned counsel for the Respondent sought seeks six weeks time to file the replies to the stay applications, which is not objected. Let the replies to",,,,

the stay applications be filed within six weeks with the advance copies to be served on the other side.,,,,

With the consent of both the parties, list the matters on 24th May, 2021.",,,,