High CourtsSingle Bench

Meraj Rashid vs State Of West Bengal & Ors

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 11 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 CAL CK 0042

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petitions (WP) No. 611 Of 2019

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 346 words

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J

The Court : Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept with the record. The petitioner has approached this Court with the grievance that, by

virtue of an order obtained by the private respondents under Section 144 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the private respondents have been

harassing the petitioner regularly with the help of the local police, despite the subsistence of an injunction order against the private respondent passed

by a Civil Court in favour of the petitioner.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that already proceedings have been taken out for implementation of the Civil Court’s order, before the

said Court.

On query of Court, learned Counsel for the petitioner further informs the Court that in the meantime, the proceeding under Section 144 (2) of the Code

of Criminal Procedure has been dropped.

As such, despite the petitioner having lodged an independent complaint with the police authorities, the grievance ventilated herein falls entirely within

the domain of the Civil Court, either for violation of the injunction order under order 39 Rule (2A) of the Code of Civil Procedure or for implementation

of such order by police help, both of which remedies can be availed of by the petitioner only before the Civil Court. Since adjudication of the

respective rights of the parties is pending before the Civil Court, it would be unwise for this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to

interfere in the matter. The matter would best be left to the discretion of the Civil Court, since the petitioner has already taken steps alleging violation

of the injunction order passed by the said Court.

Accordingly, WP 611 of 2019 is disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to ventilate all the grievances taken in the present writ petition before the

Civil Court, an injunction order of which is allegedly being violated by the private respondents.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities.