High CourtsSingle Bench

Mirat Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 6 November 1987 · Citation: (1987) WLN 760

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohini Kapoor, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25, 3
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 267 of 1987
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 228 words

Mohini Kapoor, J.—The petitioner was convicted by the Addl, Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Dholpur for the offence u/s 3/25 of the Arms Act and sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment. The conviction and sentence has been confirmed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Dholpur by order dated 5-10-1987 against this order he has come in this revision.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner has not contested the conviction on merits and from the evidence also it can be said that the witnesses have been able to prove that one Kutta (gun) along with some gun powder and potas was recovered from his possession. It is contended that the petitioner has already remained in jail for about one month and that it is, his first offence and he should be either released on probation or on the sentence already undergone.

3.

In the present case, the gun powder recovered from the petitioner is about 100 gms. only. There is no evidence to show that the Katta was fired recently. Considering the circumstances, it can be said that the ends of justice will be met, if the petitioner is released on the sentence already undergone by him.

4.

The petition is partly accepted and the petitioner is directed to be released forthwith if not wanted in any other case, as he is to be released on the sentence already undergone by him.