High CourtsSingle Bench

Mirza Alim Beg vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajani Dubey, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 307, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 1783 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 348 words

Rajani Dubey, J

1.

The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is arrested

in connection with Crime No.181/2020, registered at Police Station - Thankhamhariya, District Bemetara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under

Sections 294, 506, 307/34 IPC.

2.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 07.12.2020, on account of dispute relating to number of drum beaters, the applicant along with co-accused

persons assaulted Devendra Sinha and stabbed the knife in his abdomen, due to which he sustained grievous injuries. He was admitted in hospital and

thereafter, discharged on 23.12.2020 after surgery. Based on this, offence has been registered. The present applicant has taken into custody on

26.12.2020.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that

vide order dated 17.02.2021 passed in MCRC No.247/2021, other co-accused persons namely Mod. Saif and Rupesh Netam have already been

granted bail by this Court. He further submits that the applicant is in custody since 26.12.2020 and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in

near future. Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, quality of evidence and further considering the fact that co-accused persons

have already been granted bail by this Court, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release him on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of 1,00,000/- with two sureties of 50,000/- each

to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

9.

I.A.No.02/2021, application for urgent hearing during summer vacation also stands disposed of.