M.Manikandan vs State Of Tamil Nadu

S.Srimathy, J

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 305 of BNS, in Crime No.653 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. seeks bail.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with other accused persons, have stolen 23 ½ sovereigns of gold and mobile phone belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner's name is not found in the FIR. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 06.10.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there are 5 previous cases pending against the petitioner and substantial portion of the gold jewels has been recovered. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, and also the fact that a substantial portion of the gold jewels have been recovered and also consideration the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.