High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohad Ismail, S/O. Ibrahim vs Kandula Vasundhara, W/O. Srinviasa Rao

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 13 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 AP CK 0412

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Appeal Suit No: 871 Of 2010
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 145 words

B V L N Chakravarthi, J

1.

None appeared for the appellant.

2.

Sri I.Subrahmanyeswara Rao, learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the appellant died long ago and no steps were being taken by the legal representatives of the deceased within a period of limitation to come on record as legal representatives of the deceased. Therefore, the appeal is abated by operation of law.

3.

There is no dispute that the appellant died long ago and no steps are being taken by legal representatives of the deceased appellant within the time prosecuted by law to come on record to prosecute the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is liable to be dismissed, as abated by operation of law.

4.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.