High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohammad Danish Khan vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 9 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 MP CK 0074

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Dwivedi, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 307, 323, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.7087 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 347 words

Sanjay Dwivedi, J

This first application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed on behalf of the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail who is

apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.34/2022 registered at Police Station Kohefiza, District Bhopal (M.P.) for the offence punishable

under Sections 294, 506, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that from the case diary it is clear that the incident occurred all of a sudden and there was no premeditation.

He further submits that from the injury sustained by the complainant, it is amply clear that no case under section 307 of IPC is made out at best case

under section 323 of IPC can be said to be made out. He further submits that confronting the medical reports initially obtained from the doctors with

the subsequent clinical report obtained by the complainant, it is clear that the complainant was bent upon to anyhow bring home the offence under

section 307 of IPC. He submits that the applicant is ready to cooperate in the investigation and as such, he prays that the present applicant may be

released on anticipatory bail.

Per contra, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State opposes the bail application and submits that as per the Computerized Tomography (CT-

Scan) report, there was fracture of nasal bone detected.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, I am inclined to

enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. Therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, this application is allowed.

It is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees Eighty

Thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Arresting Officer of the Police Station

concerned.

The applicant shall abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Certified copy as per rules.